I'm finally doing it. I'm working on Holger Danske again after a long hiatus. (I am not querying either, praise the Lord. I can only take so much of that and I'm all full up right now.)
I am revamping all the scripts so that instead of a six issue miniseries, we will have one graphic novel instead (current page count 219!) It won't be that bloated when I am finished with it.
I don't know whether changing the format will solve our pitching problems or not. I have come to the conclusion that it doesn't really matter. Tailoring your project to fit the current sensibilities of the publishing industry is like target practice with a gun that doesn't shoot straight. It won't matter how much you line up, the bullet goes off sideways--the target ever illusive.
So that brings us back around to where we started all those years ago with Holger Danske. Creating a story that we like. We do what we want, *irregardless* of what the professionals like or don't like. The only people we owe a good story to is ourselves.
I agree entirely! Creating the story you like is always the best option. And thank you for elucidating the puzzling yet pervasive confusion over the term irrespective. How can so many get it wrong so often?
ReplyDelete